Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

The Icosahedral Equation

By now, it should be clear that — given an arbitrary quintic equation — it’s possible to massage this quintic into a form that can be used to easily determine the roots: first one passes from the general quintic to a corresponding “principal quintic” with roots given by

yr=Wr(z0,1)f(z0,1)H(z0,1)(λ±+μ± tr(z0,1)f2(z0,1)T(z0,1)) .y_r = \frac{W_r(z_0,1)f(z_0,1)}{H(z_0,1)} \left(\lambda_\pm + \mu_\pm\,\frac{t_r(z_0,1)f^2(z_0,1)}{T(z_0,1)}\right) \,.

where λ±\lambda_\pm, μ±\mu_\pm are determined in terms of the coefficients of the principal quintic. Once these roots are computed, the corresponding roots of the general quintic are found by solving one last quadratic equation:

yr=xr2+A xr+B±y_r = x_r^2+A\,x_r+B_\pm

for some A(pi)A(p_i), B±(pi)B_\pm(p_i) which determine the principal quintic, given the coefficients pip_i of the original quintic.

The Icosahedral Inverse and the Schwarzian

We wish to formally invert the equation

I(z):=−H3(z,1)123 f5(z,1)I(z) := - \frac{H^3(z,1)}{12^3\,f^5(z,1)}

such that a value z0z_0 can be computed from a known icosahedral parameter I0I_0. In other words, we seek a function s(x)s(x) such that s(I0)=z0s(I_0) = z_0 for any I0I_0 away from the singular points (0,1,∞)(0,1,\infty).

It has been shown previously that the function I(z)I(z) maps vertices, edge midpoints, and face centres to the singular points (∞,1,0)(\infty, 1,0), respectively. I(z)I(z) also satisfies the symmetries of the icosahedron. As such, we expect that — once we invert it on a small triangle inscribed by the points

s∞:=∞  ,s1:=v1=zn+j  ,s0:=ϵ3 w1=−eiπ/5(1−(1+k)zn2)s_\infty := \infty\;,\quad s_1 := v_1 = z_n + j\;,\quad s_0 := \epsilon^3\,w_1 = -e^{i\pi/5}\left(\frac{1-(1+k)z_n}2\right)

near the top of the icosahedron (where z→∞z\to\infty) — we’ll find that we can uniquely define a particular z0z_0 for every I0I_0 (up to some conditions, which we’ll specify). (Recall the parameters znz_n, jj, kk from earlier sections, which made easy the computation of the icosahedral-invariant polynomials; they are defined to be

zn=−cot⁡α ,j=−csc⁡α ,k=3 sec⁡αz_n = -\cot\alpha \,,\qquad j = -\csc\alpha \,,\qquad k = \sqrt{3}\,\sec\alpha

in terms of the angle α:=cos⁡−1[1/(2 sin⁡(π/5))]\alpha := \cos^{-1}\left[1/(2\,\sin(\pi/5))\right] subtended by the two-fold symmetry axis and the vertical.

We only expect the function I(z)I(z) to have an inverse on this region and its complex conjugate, since the icosahedral symmetries will map out every other z0z_0 found to reproduce a particular I0I_0 (and so the inverse would be multi-valued outside of this wedge). These singular points allow us to uniquely determine the Schwarzian of s(x)s(x), as we’ll see next.

Consider the series expansion of I(z)I(z) about the three singular points z∈{s0,s1,s∞}z \in \{s_0,s_1,s_\infty\}:

I(z)∣z=s0=20(45zn+13k−14kzn)9 ϵ(z−s0)3+O(z−s0)4I(z)∣z=s1=1−15(1−2j+3zn)(z−s1)2+O(z−s1)3I(z)∣z=s∞→−z5123+739123−98437864 z5+O(1z10) .\begin{align*} I(z)\Big|_{z=s_0} &= \frac{20 \left(45 z_{n} + 13k -14 k z_{n} \right)}{9}\,\epsilon (z-s_0)^3 + \cal{O}(z-s_0)^4 \\ I(z)\Big|_{z=s_1} &= 1 - 15(1-2j+3z_n)(z-s_1)^2 + \cal{O}(z-s_1)^3\\ I(z)\Big|_{z=s_\infty} &\to -\frac{z^5}{12^3} + \frac{739}{12^3} -\frac{98437}{864\,z^5} + \cal{O}\left(\frac1{z^{10}}\right)\,. \end{align*}

Note that, of these three expansions, only the one about z=s∞z=s_\infty embodies the corresponding (2,3,5)(2,3,5)-fold symmetry about that point. The reason for this is that the origin coincides with the five-fold axis of symmetry, since the antipodes along this axis are {0,∞}\{0,\infty\}.

Given this observation, we can perform a Möbius transformation which maps (v1,v20)(v_1, v_{20}), (w3,w28)(w_3, w_{28}) to (0,∞)(0,\infty) in each case:

z→w=z−v1z−v20 ,w=z−w3z−w28 .z\to w = \frac{z-v_1}{z-v_{20}} \,,\qquad w = \frac{z-w_3}{z - w_{28}} \,.

Before expanding about w=0w=0, let’s first consider the icosahedral parameter I(z(w))I(z(w)) by substituting z=[w(zn−j)−zn−j]/(w−1)z = [w(z_n -j) - z_n -j]/(w-1) (found by inverting the above and substituting v1=zn+jv_1=z_n+j, v20=zn−jv_{20}=z_n-j):

Loading...
Loading...

Since both H(w)H(w) and f(w)f(w) are functions of w2w^2, the two-fold symmetry is now explicit. Performing the series expansion about p:=w2=0p:=w^2 = 0, we find

I(z(w))∣p=0=1+(−120jzn+240j−480zn+60)p(w)+(−488800jzn+195520j−782080zn+611000)3 p2(w)+O(p3) .\begin{align*} I(z(w))\Big|_{p=0} &= 1 + \left(-120 j z_{n} + 240 j - 480 z_{n} + 60\right)p(w) \\ &\quad+ \frac{\left(-488800 j z_{n} + 195520 j - 782080 z_{n} + 611000\right)}3 \,p^2(w) + \cal{O}(p^3) \,. \end{align*}

Rewriting in terms of zz, we have the resummed expansion

I(z)∣z=s1=1+(−120jzn+240j−480zn+60)(z−v1z−v20)2+(−488800jzn+195520j−782080zn+611000)3(z−v1z−v20)4+O(z−v1z−v20)6 .\begin{align*} I(z)\Big|_{z=s_1} &= 1 + \left(-120 j z_{n} + 240 j - 480 z_{n} + 60\right)\left(\frac{z - v_1}{z-v_{20}}\right)^2 \\ &\quad+ \frac{\left(-488800 j z_{n} + 195520 j - 782080 z_{n} + 611000\right)}3\left(\frac{z - v_1}{z-v_{20}}\right)^4 + \cal{O}\left(\frac{z - v_1}{z-v_{20}}\right)^6 \,. \end{align*}
Loading...
Loading...

Similarly, if we instead transform zz such that (w3,w28)(w_3, w_{28}) go to (0,∞)(0, \infty), i.e.

z=ϵ3⋅w[1−(1−k)zn]−1+(1+k)zn2(w−1)↔w=z−w3w−w28 ,z = \epsilon^3\cdot\frac{w[1-(1-k)z_n]-1+(1+k)z_n}{2(w-1)} \quad\leftrightarrow\quad w = \frac{z - w_3}{w-w_{28}} \,,

then we find that I(z(w))I(z(w)) is instead a rational polynomial of q:=w3q:=w^3:

I(z(w))∣w=0=(1200kzn−900k−2700zn+1400)q(w)    +(−11227125kzn+6873750k+22683375zn−14282125)2q2(w)+O(q3)\begin{align*} I(z(w))\Big|_{w=0} &= \left(1200 k z_{n} - 900 k - 2700 z_{n} + 1400\right)q(w) \\ &\;\;+ \frac{\left(- 11227125 k z_{n} + 6873750 k + 22683375 z_{n} - 14282125\right)}2 q^{2}(w) + \cal{O}(q^3) \end{align*}

Rewriting in terms of zz, we have the resummed expansion at z=s0z=s_0:

I(z)∣z=s0=(1200kzn−900k−2700zn+1400)(z−w3z−w28)3    +(−11227125kzn2+3436875k+22683375zn2−142821252)(z−w3z−w28)6+O(z−w3z−w28)9\begin{align*} I(z)\Big|_{z=s_0} &= \left(1200 k z_{n} - 900 k - 2700 z_{n} + 1400\right)\left(\frac{z-w_3}{z-w_{28}}\right)^3 \\ &\;\;+ \left(- \frac{11227125 k z_{n}}{2} + 3436875 k + \frac{22683375 z_{n}}{2} - \frac{14282125}{2}\right) \left(\frac{z-w_3}{z-w_{28}}\right)^6 + \cal{O}\left(\frac{z-w_3}{z-w_{28}}\right)^9 \end{align*}
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Lastly, for completeness, we can apply the same reasoning to expand at z→∞z\to\infty by transforming to w=−1/zw = -1/z (swapping antipodes) and expanding as before as a function of r:=w5r := w^5:

I(z(w))∣r=0=11728 r(w)+7391728+98437 r(w)864+22478125 r2(w)1728+O(r3) .I(z(w))\Big|_{r=0} = \frac{1}{1728 \, r(w)} + \frac{739}{1728} + \frac{98437 \,r(w)}{864} + \frac{22478125 \,r^2(w)}{1728} + {\cal O}\left(r^{3}\right) \,.
Loading...
Loading...

Moreover, the resummed expressions can be easily inverted to give the corresponding expansions of the inverse about each singular point: since I∣s=siI\Big|_{s=s_i} has the general form

I∣s=si=Ii+Ai(z−siz−s^i)n+Bi(z−siz−s^i)2n+O(z−siz−s^i)3nI\Big|_{s=s_i} = I_i + A_i\left(\frac{z-s_i}{z-{\hat s}_{i}}\right)^n + B_i\left(\frac{z-s_i}{z-{\hat s}_{i}}\right)^{2n} + \cal{O}\left(\frac{z-s_i}{z-{\hat s}_{i}}\right)^{3n}

for sis_i with i∈{0,1}i\in\{0,1\} (we denote the antipode to sis_i as s^i{\hat s}_i) then the corresponding inverse is defined implicitly to be

s(x)−sis(x)−s^i=(x−IiAi)1/n[1−BinAi(x−IiAi)+O(x−IiAi)2]\frac{s(x)-s_i}{s(x)-{\hat s}_{i}} = \left(\frac{x-I_i}{A_i}\right)^{1/n}\left[ 1 - \frac {B_i}{nA_i} \left(\frac{x-I_i}{A_i}\right) + {\cal O}\left(\frac{x-I_i}{A_i}\right)^{2}\right]

(from which z=s(I)z = s(I)).

The above gives us insight into the structure of singular points of s(x)s(x), as we’ll now see. Consider the Schwarzian, S[s(x)]S[s(x)] given by

S[s(x)]:=(s′′(x)s′(x))′−12(s′′(x)s′(x))2 .S[s(x)] := \left( \frac{s''(x)}{s'(x)}\right)'-\frac12\left( \frac{s''(x)}{s'(x)}\right)^2 \,.

Any Möbius transformation has zero Schwarzian (by definition), so applying the Schwarzian to the above power series gives

S[s(x)]∣x=Ii=S[s(x)−sis(x)−s^i]∣x=Ii=1−1/n22(x−Ii)2−Bi(1−1/n2)Ai2(x−Ii)+O(x−Ii)0 .S[s(x)]\Big|_{x=I_i} = S\left[\frac{s(x)-s_i}{s(x)-{\hat s}_i}\right]\bigg|_{x=I_i} = \frac{1-1/n^2}{2(x-I_i)^2} -\frac {B_i(1-1/n^2)}{A_i^2(x-I_i)} + {\cal O}(x-I_i)^0 \,.

Therefore, the leading and subleading terms in each expansion give all the singular behaviour in the Schwarzian.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Near x=I0=0x=I_0 = 0, we that — although the expressions for A0A_0 and B0B_0 are quite complex (involving square roots of square roots via kk) — we find that the ratio

B0A02=−11227125kzn+6873750k+22683375zn−142821252(1200kzn−900k−2700zn+1400)2=−6111600\frac{B_0}{A_0^2} = \frac{- 11227125 k z_{n} + 6873750 k + 22683375 z_{n} - 14282125}{2(1200 k z_{n} - 900 k - 2700 z_{n} + 1400)^2} = -\frac{611}{1600}

gives a rational number.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Similarly, we find near x=I1=1x=I_1=1 that

B1A12=−488800jzn+195520j−782080zn+6110003(−120jzn+240j−480zn+60)2=6111350\frac{B_1}{A_1^2} = \frac{- 488800 j z_{n} + 195520 j - 782080 z_{n} + 611000}{3(- 120 j z_{n} + 240 j - 480 z_{n} + 60)^2} = \frac{611}{1350}

gives a rational number as well.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

We’ll see that the reason for this later on, but, to preview: the vertices v0v_0, v1v_1, and v∞v_\infty form a Schwarz triangle on the Riemann sphere with internal angles (π/ν0,π/ν1,π/ν∞)(\pi/\nu_0,\pi/\nu_1,\pi/\nu_\infty), where

ν0=3 ,ν1=2 ,ν∞=5 .\nu_0 = 3\,,\qquad \nu_1 = 2\,,\qquad \nu_\infty = 5\,.

The properties of analytic functions on a Schwarz triangle are well-known, but it’s sufficient to know that the singularities near s=s0s = s_0, s=s1s = s_1 — together with the asymptotic expansion near s=s∞s = s_\infty — are sufficient to determine the Schwarzian of s(x)s(x). In particular, we’ll find that

S[s(x)]=∑i=0,1αi(x−Ii)2+∑i=0,1βix−Ii+γS[s(x)] = \sum_{i=0,1}\frac{\alpha_i}{(x - I_i)^2} + \sum_{i=0,1}\frac{\beta_i}{x - I_i} + \gamma

where αi=(1−1/νi2)/2\alpha_i = (1-1/\nu_i^2)/2, β0=−β1=(1+1/ν∞2−1/ν02−1/ν12)/2\beta_0 = -\beta_1 = (1+1/\nu_\infty^2 -1/\nu_0^2-1/\nu_1^2)/2, and γ=0\gamma=0.

As s→s∞s \to s_\infty, we find instead that the inverted series has the form

s(x)∣s=s∞=−(xA∞)1/5[1−B∞nA∞(xA∞)−1+O(xAi)−2]s(x)\Big|_{s=s_\infty} = -\left(\frac{x}{A_\infty}\right)^{1/5}\left[ 1 - \frac {B_\infty}{nA_\infty} \left(\frac{x}{A_\infty}\right)^{-1} + {\cal O}\left(\frac{x}{A_i}\right)^{-2}\right]

where A∞=1/1728A_\infty = 1/1728 and B∞=739/1728B_\infty = 739/1728. We can show this by inverting the series for I~(r(w)):=1728 I(z(w))\tilde I(r(w)) := 1728\,I(z(w)), i.e.

I~(r):=1r+739+196874 r+22478125 r2+O(r3)\tilde I (r) := \frac1r + 739 + 196874\,r + 22478125\,r^2 + {\cal O}(r^3)

to determine r(x)r(x) (for which r(I~(r))=1r(\tilde I(r)) = 1), and then taking the fifth root on the principal branch (since r(z)=−1/z5r(z) = -1/z^5) to determine s(x)s(x):

Loading...
Loading...

Since we find

r(x)=1x+739x2+742995x3+862531202x4+O(x−5)r(x) = \frac{1}{x} + \frac{739}{x^{2}} + \frac{742995}{x^{3}} + \frac{862531202}{x^{4}} + {\cal O}(x^{-5})

upon inverting, the inverse s(x)∣x→s∞s(x)\big|_{x \to s_\infty} has the asymptotic series

s(x)=−123/5 x1/5(1+739123 x+742995126 x2+862531202129 x3+O(x−4))−1/5=−123/5 x1/5(1−7398640x−1730516220800x2−9530498509644972544000x3+O(x−4)) .\begin{align*} s(x) &= -12^{3/5}\,x^{1/5}\left(1 + \frac{739}{12^3\,x} + \frac{742995}{12^6\,x^{2}} + \frac{862531202}{12^9\,x^{3}}+ {\cal O}(x^{-4})\right)^{-1/5} \\ &= -12^{3/5}\,x^{1/5}\left(1 - \frac{739}{8640 x} - \frac{173051}{6220800 x^{2}} - \frac{9530498509}{644972544000 x^{3}} + {\cal O}(x^{-4})\right)\,. \end{align*}
Loading...

Computing the Schwarzian of the asymptotic expansion above, we find

S[s(x)]∣x=I∞=1225x2+7391800x3+707900x4+20891800x5+O(x−6) .S[s(x)]\Big|_{x=I_\infty} = \frac{12}{25x^2} +\frac{739}{1800x^3} +\frac{707}{900x^4} +\frac{2089}{1800x^5} + {\cal O}(x^{-6}) \,.
Loading...

Combining these with the expansions about x=0,1x=0,1, namely

S[s(x)]∣x=I0=49x2+6111800x+O(x0)S[s(x)]∣x=I1=38(x−1)2−6111800(x−1)+O[(x−1)0]\begin{align*} S[s(x)]\Big|_{x=I_0} &= \frac{4}{9x^2} +\frac {611}{1800x} + {\cal O}(x^0) \\ S[s(x)]\Big|_{x=I_1} &= \frac{3}{8(x-1)^2} -\frac {611}{1800(x-1)} + {\cal O}[(x-1)^0] %\\ % S[s(x)]\Big|_{x=I_\infty} &= \frac{12}{25x^2} +\frac{739}{1800x^3} +\frac{707}{900x^4} +\frac{2089}{1800x^5} + {\cal O}(x^{-6}) \,, \end{align*}

we find that, indeed, these asymptotic expressions can be found by expanding the full expression

S[s(x)]=(1−1/ν02)2x2+(1−1/ν12)2(1−x)2+(1+1/ν∞2−1/ν02−1/ν12)2x(1−x)S[s(x)] = \frac{\left(1-1/\nu_0^2\right)}{2x^2}+\frac{\left(1-1/\nu_1^2\right)}{2(1-x)^2}+\frac{\left(1+1/\nu_\infty^2-1/\nu_0^2-1/\nu_1^2\right)}{2x(1-x)}

in the appropriate limits.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

As one last check of the expression above for S[s(x)]S[s(x)], one can take the demonstrated leading behaviour of S[s(x)]S[s(x)] at x=0,1x=0,1 and show that, in order for

S[s(x)]∣x→∞=1−1/ν∞22x2+O(x−3)S[s(x)]\Big|_{x\to\infty} = \frac{1-1/\nu_\infty^2}{2x^2} + {\cal O}(x^{-3})

as well, the singular terms must have exactly this form. To see this, take the expression

S[s(x)]=1−ν022x2+1−ν122(x−1)2+β0x+β1x−1+γS[s(x)] = \frac{1-\nu_0^2}{2x^2} + \frac{1-\nu_1^2}{2(x-1)^2} + \frac{\beta_0}x + \frac{\beta_1}{x-1} + \gamma

and expand:

S[s(x)]∣x→∞=γ+β0+β1x+β1+1−1/ν02−1/ν12x2+O(x−3) .S[s(x)]\Big|_{x\to\infty} = \gamma + \frac{\beta_0+\beta_1}x + \frac{\beta_1 +1 -1/\nu_0^2-1/\nu_1^2}{x^2}+ {\cal O}(x^{-3}) \,.

(We could instead consider γ\gamma to be a regular function of xx, but Schwarz reflection across the real line would then impose that it be constant.) At each order, the conditions are γ=0\gamma = 0 at O(x0){\cal O}(x^0), β0=−β1\beta_0 = -\beta_1 at O(x−1){\cal O}(x^{-1}), and β1=(1+1/ν∞2−1/ν02−1/ν12)/2\beta_1 = (1+1/\nu_\infty^2 - 1/\nu_0^2-1/\nu_1^2)/2 at O(x−2){\cal O}(x^{-2}).

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Solving the Schwarzian

It can be shown that the general solution to the the Schwarzian equation S[s(x)]=f(x)S[s(x)] = f(x) is given by

s(x)=g2(x)g1(x)s(x) = \frac{g_2(x)}{g_1(x)}

where gi(x)g_i(x), i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\} are two independent solutions (i.e. with Wronskian g1(x)g2′(x)−g2(x) g1′(x)≠0g_1(x)g'_2(x) - g_2(x)\,g'_1(x)\neq 0) to the second-order equation

g′′(x)+12 f(x) g(x)=0 .g''(x)+\frac12\,f(x)\,g(x) = 0 \,.

Since the singular points of s(x)s(x) are at 0, 1, and ∞\infty, we expect the hypergeometric function

h(x):=2F1(a,b;c;x)=∑n=0∞(a)n(b)n(c)n xnn!h(x) := {}_2F_1(a,b;c;x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(a)_n(b)_n}{(c)_n}\,\frac{x^n}{n!}

to play a prominent role. It’s well understood to be a solution of the differential equation

x(1−z) h′′(x)+[c−(a+b+1)x] h′(x)−ab h(x)=0 ,x(1-z)\,h''(x)+[c-(a+b+1)x]\,h'(x)-ab\,h(x) = 0 \,,

which can be rewritten as

g′′(x)+[[1−(a−b)2] x2+[2c(a+b−1)−4ab] x+c(2−c)4x2(1−x)2]g(x)=0g''(x) + \left[\frac{[1-(a-b)^2]\,x^2+[2c(a+b-1)-4ab]\,x+c(2-c)}{4x^2(1-x)^2}\right]g(x) = 0

by substituting h(x)=x−c/2(1−x)(c−1−a−b)/2g(x)h(x) = x^{-c/2}(1-x)^{(c-1-a-b)/2} g(x). (The prefactor has been engineered to cancel the first-derivative term, but is nevertheless unimportant once the ratio s(x)=g2(x)/g1(x)s(x) = g_2(x) / g_1(x) is computed.)

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Comparing the bracketed term above to

12 f(x)=(1−1/ν02)(1−x)2+(1−1/ν12)x2+(1+1/ν∞2−1/ν02−1/ν12)x(1−x)4x2(1−x)2\frac12\, f(x) = \frac{\left(1-1/\nu_0^2\right)(1-x)^2+\left(1-1/\nu_1^2\right)x^2+ \left(1+1/\nu_\infty^2-1/\nu_0^2-1/\nu_1^2\right)x(1-x)}{4x^2(1-x)^2}

we find that

1ν02=(1−c)2  ,1ν12=(c−a−b)2  ,1ν∞2=(a−b)2 .\frac1{\nu_0^2} = (1-c)^2\;,\qquad \frac1{\nu_1^2} = (c-a-b)^2\;,\qquad \frac1{\nu_\infty^2} = (a-b)^2 \,.
Loading...

Denoting the sign choices as σ0\sigma_0, σ1\sigma_1, σ∞\sigma_\infty (where σi=±1\sigma_i = \pm 1), we can invert and find

a=12(1−σ0ν0−σ1ν1+σ∞ν∞)  ,b=12(1−σ0ν0−σ1ν1−σ∞ν∞)  ,c=1−σ0ν0 .a = \frac12\left(1-\frac{\sigma_0}{\nu_0}-\frac{\sigma_1}{\nu_1}+\frac{\sigma_\infty}{\nu_\infty}\right) \;,\qquad b=\frac12\left(1-\frac{\sigma_0}{\nu_0}-\frac{\sigma_1}{\nu_1}-\frac{\sigma_\infty}{\nu_\infty}\right)\;,\qquad c = 1 - \frac{\sigma_0}{\nu_0} \,.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Since we’d like to fix s(x)s(x) such that s(∞)→∞s(\infty) \to \infty, we’ll choose the expansion point for the hypergeometric solutions to be 1/x1/x. As such, the linearly independent solutions in this case are

g1(x)=x−a2F1(a,1+a−c;1+a−b;1/x)g2(x)=x−b 2F1(b,1+b−c;1+b−a;1/x) .\begin{align*} g_1(x) &= x^{-a}{}_2F_1(a, 1+a-c;1+a-b;1/x) \\ g_2(x) &= x^{-b}\,{}_2F_1(b,1+b-c;1+b-a;1/x) \,. \end{align*}

To fix the overall scale of s(x)s(x), as well as the sign σ∞\sigma_\infty, we examine the asymptotic expansion of the ratio as x→∞x\to\infty and determine that

s(x)=−(1728 x)1/5 2F1(b,1+b−c;1+b−a;1/x)2F1(a,1+a−c;1+a−b;1/x) .s(x) = - (1728\,x)^{1/5}\,\frac{{}_2F_1(b,1+b-c;1+b-a;1/x)}{{}_2F_1(a, 1+a-c;1+a-b;1/x)} \,.
Loading...
Loading...

Since we expect the expansion at x→∞x\to\infty to be local, it’s expected to not depend on the sign choices σ0\sigma_0, σ1\sigma_1. However, σ∞\sigma_\infty must be chosen to be positive such that series expansion agrees with the inverted series found previously.

Similarly, if take the expansion point to be x=0x=0, we find that the ratio

s(x)∝2F1(1+a−c,1+b−c;2−c;x)2F1(a,b;c;x)s(x) \propto \frac{{}_2F_1(1+a-c,1+b-c;2-c;x)}{{}_2F_1(a, b;c;x)}

(with σ0=+1\sigma_0 = +1) gives the appropriate expansion near x=0x=0.

Loading...
Loading...

Lastly, at x=1x=1, we find that

s(x)∝(1−x)c−a−b2F1(c−a,c−b;1+c−a−b;1−x)2F1(a,b;1+a+b−c;1−x)s(x) \propto \frac{(1-x)^{c-a-b}{}_2F_1(c-a,c-b;1+c-a-b;1-x)}{{}_2F_1(a, b;1+a+b-c;1-x)}

(with σ0=+1\sigma_0 = +1) gives a series expansion appropriate to that singularity.

Loading...
Loading...